Classical Theism, Philosophy, and Religion Forum

You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



8/01/2015 8:06 pm  #1


The four logical steps to explicit propositional faith

I present for discussion my understanding of this subject, which is the framework of many issues related to religion.

The "complete" definition of faith (as opposed to the "strict" traditional definition) in CCC #150:

"Faith is first of all a personal adherence of man to God. At the same time, and inseparably, it is a free assent to the whole truth that God has revealed. As personal adherence to God and assent to his truth, Christian faith differs from our faith in any human person. It is right and just to entrust oneself wholly to God and to believe absolutely what he says. It would be futile and false to place such faith in a creature."

involves two aspects, the second being a necessary consequence of the first:

- a personal adherence of man to God: faith as vital attitude, personal faith;

- a free assent to the whole truth that God has revealed: faith as knowledge, propositional faith.

This "complete" definition of faith corresponds exactly to the calling by Jesus at the beginning of his ministry: «The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand; repent and believe in the gospel.» (Mk 1:15).

- "repent": personal faith;
- "believe in the gospel": propositional faith.

Let's try to identify the logical steps involved. To "please God" one must "come to Him" (Heb 11:6), "adhere personally to Him". This personal adherence («repent»), which as we will see is step 2:

- pre-requires (step 1) to "believe that He exists and that He rewards those who seek Him" (Heb 11:6). To note, the author of the Epistle to the Hebrews affirms that this belief in the basic tenets of theism, just by itself, constitutes faith, which is clear since he is talking about Enoch, the seventh patriarch (Heb 11:5-6), who lived before God made any revelation and who therefore did not believe in any revealed truth . Since the belief "that God exists and that He rewards those who seek Him", which is affirming a proposition, is the necessary foundation for both personal faith and believing that God has revealed any truths and the revealed truths themselves, I call it "theistic foundational knowledge", which, in contrast with faith, which is based on the authority of God, is based on rationally apprehensible praeambula fidei (Rom 1:19-20).

- necessarily includes the disposition to believe whatever God has revealed in the past and/or will (at least in principle) reveal in the future, before (at least logically) knowing whether God has actually made any revelation at all. I call that disposition "implicit propositional faith" in response to the Revelation that God has made and/or will (at least in principle) make.

To note, Christians do believe that divine Revelation has been "sealed" with the death of St John Evangelist. However, this belief derives from what God has actually revealed, not from an a priori notion that all divine Revelation must already have taken place.

Now, it is clear that, to be able to "assent to the whole truth that God has revealed" (step 4), it is necessary first to identify the medium through which God has revealed and/or (at least in principle) is currently revealing/will reveal in the future (step 3). Since the identification of the medium of Revelation, which is affirming a proposition, is the necessary foundation for believing what God has revealed through said medium, I call it "foundational knowledge on the medium of Revelation", which, in contrast with faith, which is based on the authority of God, is based on rationally apprehensible motives of credibility (Jn 10:37-38).

In the mentioned case of Jesus' preaching in Mk 1:15, his audience, composed by Israelites, already held the basic truths of theism (step 1), and were able to identify Jesus as the medium through which God was revealing on the basis of the miracles that Jesus performed (step 3). Thus they were able to simultaneously perform steps 2 «repent» and 4 «believe in the gospel».

Thus we have the four logical steps to faith and their results:

1. Believe in God as Absolute Being and therefore Absolute Good, specifically OUR Absolute Good = theistic foundational knowledge, based on rationally apprehensible praembula fidei.

2. Adhere personally to God, which includes the disposition to believe whatever God has revealed and/or will reveal = personal faith, including implicit propositional faith.

3. Identify the medium of divine Revelation = foundational knowledge on the medium of Revelation, based on rationally apprehensible motives of credibility.

4. Believe in all the truths that God has revealed through the medium identified in step 3 = explicit propositional faith in response to Revelation, based on the authority of God who reveals.

The last step is what St. Thomas Aquinas refers to when he speaks of "faith". It is also what the Ecumenical Council Vatican I refers to in its Dogmatic Constitution "Dei Filius", ch. 3 "On faith":

"The Catholic Church professes that this faith, which is the beginning of human salvation, is a supernatural virtue, by means of which, with the inspiration and assistance of the grace of God, we believe that the things revealed by Him are true, not because the intrinsic truth of the things has been perceived by the natural light of reason, but because of the authority of God Himself who reveals them, who can neither deceive nor be deceived."

Clearly this "strict" definition of faith cannot apply to the identification of the medium of divine Revelation, lest the epistemic situation be circular, as a person should have to identify M as the medium through which God reveals by an assent to the truth that "God reveals through M" based on the authority of God who revealed (through M) said truth (i.e. that He reveals through M)!  Thus, the medium of divine Revelation must be rationally identified, based on its motives of credibility.

 

Last edited by Johannes (8/02/2015 9:16 am)

 

8/02/2015 4:05 am  #2


Re: The four logical steps to explicit propositional faith

Johannes wrote:

This "complete" definition of faith corresponds exactly to the calling by Jesus at the beginning of his ministry: «The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand; convert and believe in the gospel.» (Mk 1:15).

- "convert": personal faith;
- "believe in the gospel": propositional faith.
 

Just one minor quibble: It says "repent" rather than "convert", and this difference is somewhat important. John the Baptist and Jesus of Nazareth were not in the business of converting the Jews from some wrong religion to true religion. Rather, their message was that Jews were not properly faithful to what their own faith was really supposed to be. So, repentance was in order, and renewed affirmation of the essence of faith as proclaimed already by the earlier prophets. 

 

8/02/2015 7:50 am  #3


Re: The four logical steps to explicit propositional faith

seigneur wrote:

Johannes wrote:

This "complete" definition of faith corresponds exactly to the calling by Jesus at the beginning of his ministry: «The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand; convert and believe in the gospel.» (Mk 1:15).

- "convert": personal faith;
- "believe in the gospel": propositional faith.
 

Just one minor quibble: It says "repent" rather than "convert", and this difference is somewhat important. John the Baptist and Jesus of Nazareth were not in the business of converting the Jews from some wrong religion to true religion. Rather, their message was that Jews were not properly faithful to what their own faith was really supposed to be. So, repentance was in order, and renewed affirmation of the essence of faith as proclaimed already by the earlier prophets. 

It says 'μετανοεῖτε' - 'think differently after'.  Jesus also seemed to change Roman and Samaritans minds also and eventually told the the apostles to presumably bring everyone to "μετανοεῖτε", thus while, indeed, most of Christ's earthly ministry was concerned with attempting to bring his message to the Jews who, because of the proximity of the Law to his teaching, were most suited to receive him, he is evidently both in his living and post-Resurrection message concerned with all mankind and must bring them much closer to the truth than he might with the jewish people.

He is, thus, in some respect, announcing his being in the conversion business for someone.


Fighting to the death "the noonday demon" of Acedia.
My Books
It is precisely “values” that are the powerless and threadbare mask of the objectification of beings, an objectification that has become flat and devoid of background. No one dies for mere values.
~Martin Heidegger
 

8/02/2015 9:11 am  #4


Re: The four logical steps to explicit propositional faith

On the one hand, "conversion" has two meanings:
a. conversion to God,
b. conversion from one religion to another.

Clearly "Μετανοεῖτε" in the preaching of John the Baptist (Mt 3:2) and Jesus (Mt 4:17; Mk 1:15), as well as the variant "Μετανοήσατε" in the preaching of Peter (Acts 2:38, 3:19), have the first meaning: "turn to Him with all your heart and with all your soul" (Tob 13:6). The CCC speaks of "conversion" in this sense in points 1427-1433.

On the other hand, I've just checked in http://biblehub.com/mark/1-15.htm that no English translation renders "Μετανοεῖτε" as "convert", but almost all of them as "repent" (*). Which is clearly OK since "a conversion to God with all our heart" necessarily includes "a turning away from evil, with repugnance toward the evil actions we have committed" (CCC #1431). In fact, the reason why I wrote "convert" was just because I had written this first in Spanish, and the best Spanish translations render "Μετανοεῖτε" as "convertíos". So I acknowledge the issue and will change the post accordingly.

(*) The only exceptions being God's Word Translation: "Change the way you think and act" and Young's Literal Translation: "reform ye".

Last edited by Johannes (8/02/2015 9:17 am)

     Thread Starter
 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum