bulldog91 wrote:
Why is this relevant to the discussion?
It's relevant insofar as I thought that we were unnecessarily concerned with naturalists' intuitions that something or another is "strange". If you're a Thomist why should you care, just of itself, whether naturalists think something is spooky? As theists it was already known naturalists weren't going to be able to ultimately agree in any case.
Fighting to the death "the noonday demon" of Acedia.
My BooksIt is precisely “values” that are the powerless and threadbare mask of the objectification of beings, an objectification that has become flat and devoid of background. No one dies for mere values.~Martin Heidegger
