Classical Theism, Philosophy, and Religion Forum / Act/Potency and reciprocity.

**Posted by Calhoun** 3/06/2018 8:17 am

As I note here , Philosopher Rögnvaldur Ingthorsson argues that act/potency view is scientifically falsified, As I skimmed passed some of his work that is available online, I had a hard time grasping his point but maybe you guys should give it a read. I hope take a more detailed look later.

Last edited by Calhoun (3/06/2018 8:17 am)

**Posted by DanielCC** 3/06/2018 10:37 am

Calhoun wrote:
As I note here , Philosopher Rögnvaldur Ingthorsson argues that act/potency view is scientifically falsified

No disrespect to you but I stopped reading at this point

**Posted by FrenchySkepticalCatholic** 3/13/2018 3:36 am

Hey !

I posted your article on the Aquinas forum, in French, to which the administrator (a scholarly Aristotelian) published a translation and some replies. Ingthorsson himself did come by to give us some reply. You can see the discussion here.

FSC

**Posted by Calhoun** 3/13/2018 5:30 am

DanielCC wrote:
Calhoun wrote:
As I note here , Philosopher Rögnvaldur Ingthorsson argues that act/potency view is scientifically falsified
No disrespect to you but I stopped reading at this point

It can't be, I am not endorsing the view quoted by you.

FrenchySkepticalCatholic wrote:
Hey !

I posted your article on the Aquinas forum, in French, to which the administrator (a scholarly Aristotelian) published a translation and some replies. Ingthorsson himself did come by to give us some reply. You can see the discussion here.

FSC

Thanks, I am little busy otherwise I would surely give the paper he refers to a more detailed look.