Classical Theism, Philosophy, and Religion Forum

You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



8/12/2016 8:52 pm  #1


Reading Group, Round 3: Substance and the Problem of Individuation FAQ

This was originally posted to the reading group on July 10th:
                         http://i611.photobucket.com/albums/tt196/johnwest8/Non-substance%20and%20substance%20tree_zpsljocf38m.png
What is a substance?

A substance is something that has causal powers, and bears properties but is not itself borne by anything else.

What's the difference between a substance-attribute theorist and a bundle theorist?

Substance-attribute theorists think a flower an irreducible-substance-instantiating-properties; bundle theorists, nothing more than its properties. Substance-attribute theorists think there are irreducible substances; bundle theorists, that they're reducible to bundles of universals or tropes.

(Technical note: Having written this, there is a sense in which some bundle theorists substantialize first-order properties so those properties can themselves have properties.)

Is Aristotle's definition of a substance different?

The above way of characterizing individual substances may be found in Aristotle, but see Loux

What is the Problem of Individuation?

Moreland writes:

To clarify . . ., recall Socrates and Plato, two red, round spots that share all their pure properties in common. The problem of individuation is the problem of offering an ontological [account] of the situation so as to specify what it is that makes the two red spots two particular, individual entities instead of one. (Universals)

Most people would use two red apples, not dots.

 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum