I've been quietly investigating the matter of Jeremy since you started complaining. I'm waiting for one reply, but so far as I can tell right now the only person having any problem with him is you. In fact, some people have even complimented his moderating (N. B. mainly staunch conservatives).

Now, we have clear rules against posting off-topic so much it drags the thread off-topic (threadjacking). We've given you a tonne of room to air your complaint publicly, and two other avenues (i.e. Brian and I). I'll be deleting all further posts about this in this thread. 

I've opened a thread about the scholastic disputations subforum here, and a running list of updates here.

I've been thinking, for a long time, of opening a dedicated formal debate subforum with rules modeled on the scholastic method of disputation. They don't leave much room for shenanigans. It might be good for those looking for a super formal mode of debate. Perhaps I'll reopen the issue in the new forum's administration forum. 

(One caveat: I'm not, personally, going to have much time to keep after it for the next year, so it will partly depend on whether other moderators are willing to get behind it.)

I hadn't even thought to see whether we can add banners. Thanks.

(I edited this in above, but I'll put it here for good measure as well: in case anyone reading earlier comments is worried, there is no bad blood among staff. Jeremy and I are friends going back like ten years now. I think he's wrong about quite a lot, of course.)

By the way, Jeremy isn't just an administrator on this forum. He's the owner. I literally couldn't remove him if I wanted to. I couldn't remove him if he wanted to. (We actually tried once when he wanted to step down.) He's not the owner of the new forum. I would be more worried that between the massive cloud of poison now in front of the new forum's entrance and natural human hesitation, you've made a move unlikely and thereby Jeremy untouchable.