Speaking of the Jesus Mythicists, this reminds me of other historical errors that are prevalent in US culture that even in schools they get it wrong. For example, I hear that medieval people believed that the earth was flat despite the fact that people knew the earth was round since ancient times. The spanish inquisiton (black legend) or inquistion in general were runned by sadistic, powerhungry churchmen that tortured heretics in extreme ways versus the liberating, enlightened, protestants who fought for freedom. The crusaders were barbarians who wanted to expand and colonize other countries. One of my personal favorite ones, the so-called religion versus science war (eventhough Galileo was an exception) or any thing pre-Enlightment is bad. However, I rarely hear about the brutal history of communist regimes, the Cristero war in Mexico, the Spanish persecution of the Catholic Church during the 1930s, the violent French Revolution, etc. Is it just me or there is some sort of anti-christian historical bias? Nevertheless, I could be wrong about this, but there is something fishy going. Any thoughts?

Hi everybody! How could a Thomist respond if an atheist attacks the concept of God or show the divine attributes are contradictory, etc? Any response can be helpful.

I think that worst "argument" against God is the "science has disproven God" argument. Also, why do you keep reading Dawkins if he is terrible? (Even though "terrible" is an understatement)

I have the book, but choosing "the best polemic" is hard for me. I think the whole book is good because of its philosophical argumentation, and humor mixed with a harsh tone against the "New Atheists."

I found an article that talks about the evidential/probabilistic argument from evil: http://www.strangenotions.com/why-the-problem-of-evil-makes-god-unlikely/
What do you guys think?