Classical Theism, Philosophy, and Religion Forum

You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



3/12/2016 12:32 pm  #1


Thomism and God's causation of sin

In Traditional Thomistic thought, God causes the act of sin but not the evil of sin. The basic line of reasoning is that since evil is a privation, it has no efficient cause but only a deficient cause. And a deficient cause is only appropriately ascribed to the human will but not to God in the case of evil.

I have two questions regarding this point, one dealing with philosophy and the other dealing with Catholicism.
1) Philosophically, for the Thomists out there, how would you in particular defend the claim that the human will is the deficient cause of the evil of sin but not God? I am familiar with some of the traditional analogies and approaches, but what do you guys think?

2) The Council of Trent teaches that God is not the cause of sin. Now, classically, Thomists will simply agree and say that God isnt the cause of sin b/c sin is an act and a defect and God only causes the act but not the defect. However, the Council also sites a particular example, namely, the distinction between Paul's conversion and Judas's betrayal of Christ. In doing so, the Council states that God is not equally the cause of both. However, the Council sites actions and compares the two. How do Thomists feel about this example? What do others think?


 

 

3/12/2016 2:38 pm  #2


Re: Thomism and God's causation of sin

I agree with what you say about Davies. That is my problem with the Thomistic view.

And here is what Trent says:

"If anyone says that it is not in man's power to make his ways evil, but that the works that are evil as well as those that are good God produces, not permissively only but also propria et per se, so that the treason of Judas is no less His own proper work than the vocation of St. Paul, let him be anathema"

I think on a non-Thomist view, this is fine. However, on a Thomist view, I see how they may try to clarify the first part of the claim but the specific example seems difficult because on Thomism, God is the cause of the treason and the vocation but not the evil of the treason but yes the good of the vocation

     Thread Starter
 

3/14/2016 7:49 pm  #3


Re: Thomism and God's causation of sin

But God offers us grace and we refuse it. It's not that God was deficient in the actuality of a human moral evil; it's that we were deficient, and this is the cause of the evil. We at best choose a finite good over an infinite good. To be sure, the scandal of human evil results exactly from God's refusal to abandon us, His work/creatures. It is in man's power to make his ways evil; however, it is not in his power to make his ways good because no man is the cause as such of goodness; i.e., man could not be good unless something good was first given to him. Gratitude is thus an extremely important habit and virtue in man.

This is one reason why murder is such a grave sin. We cannot possibly replace or undo the damage we have done, because a human soul is of infinite value and we have but the power to do finite good; and to exchange an infinite good for a finite one is always wrong.

It is our own retreat from God - a refusal to be agents of His goodness - that is the cause of evil in this world. But this should not be exaggerated, as we are ultimately incapable of anything like infinite evil. We cannot abolish God, for example; nor is it even metaphysically possible to eliminate the good or goodness in or from the natural world/creation. Now recalling to mind that a human soul is of itself of infinite value, then it is difficult to see what circumstances of evil and depravity amongst mankind could exist that would utterly make futile the production of human souls as such. Indeed, that there are limits is not known, I think, to reason but only from Revelation. I think in part this is why Aristotle intuited no problems with an eternal universe. The good ultimately cannot be destroyed even in nature/the natural world. To that extent, there is no necessary reason for it ever to cease to be (but if otherwise then there would have been reason for its never coming to be).

Last edited by Timocrates (3/14/2016 7:52 pm)


"The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State."
- Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 16 (3).

Defend your Family. Join the U.N. Family Rights Caucus.
 

3/14/2016 9:07 pm  #4


Re: Thomism and God's causation of sin

Timocrates wrote:

But God offers us grace and we refuse it. It's not that God was deficient in the actuality of a human moral evil; it's that we were deficient, and this is the cause of the evil. We at best choose a finite good over an infinite good. To be sure, the scandal of human evil results exactly from God's refusal to abandon us, His work/creatures. It is in man's power to make his ways evil; however, it is not in his power to make his ways good because no man is the cause as such of goodness; i.e., man could not be good unless something good was first given to him. Gratitude is thus an extremely important habit and virtue in man.
.

This is a fine position to hold in my view. However, it is not the Thomistic position. The Thomistic position holds that in an act of moral evil, God causes the human being to choose to act wrongly and to choose freely that is. However, the choice itself is a good and therefore comes from God. The fact that the choice is for evil is a deficiency and therefore has no efficient cause. Rather, the cause is the human will in virtue of not striving for moral goodness. That is the Thomistic view

     Thread Starter
 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum