Offline
I was reading a few works on Shakespeare, such as one by Linda Woodbridge. She invokes Foucault alongside literary critics and anthropologists influenced by deconstructionism and post-modernism. She invoked, for example, anthropologists who claim you can never say anything universal about cultures.
Offline
Well, that seems like an empirical claim. I'm not sure it's true- though I suppose it would make anthropology a priori impossible. It would, for instance preclude even antropological schemas by which you would describe cultures: like trying to have anatomy without organs.
Let me look at her. A Foucaultian reading of specific history can be illuminating. Broad strokes, it's usually terrible.
Last edited by iwpoe (9/30/2016 9:11 pm)