As I understand it, should substantivalism be true, then there could be space independent of anything else existing, this to me implies that there'd be nothing there for space to have a compresence relation with, and therefore, there would be something which exists independent of a bundle. If this isn't the intuition behind why bundle of tropes theorists can't analyze space non-relationally, then I'm not sure if I get the argument.
(1) My question is, what is it about a property-trope that commits them to the relational view of space?
Maybe I'm getting hung up on the terminology. (2) Is the argument that if all we're going to use is property-tropes, then given that space could exist independent of a bundle, but we want to analyze it as a property-trope, what is it a property of? Thus, we should use substance-tropes for space and then abandon bundle theory. But (3) doesn't a trope already serve both as a susbtance and a property?
Last edited by Dennis (10/08/2016 10:43 pm)