Poll: What are substances?

Skip to: New Posts  Last Post
Page:  Next »
Posted by John West
9/27/2016 5:11 pm
#1

A follow-up to my properties poll. Still trying to find out where everyone stands:


What are substances?











 
Posted by iwpoe
9/28/2016 6:40 am
#2

Modified Aristotelian view: substances are unified imminentizing Form.


Fighting to the death "the noonday demon" of Acedia.
My Books
It is precisely “values” that are the powerless and threadbare mask of the objectification of beings, an objectification that has become flat and devoid of background. No one dies for mere values.
~Martin Heidegger
 
Posted by John West
9/30/2016 11:49 am
#3

Both polls are still open.

 
Posted by Dennis
10/01/2016 9:53 am
#4

I need more time to vote. To those who believe in the existence of bare/thin particulars, how do you establish their existence? 

 
Posted by John West
10/02/2016 3:27 pm
#5

Dennis wrote:

To those who believe in the existence of bare/thin particulars, how do you establish their existence? 

To make a long story short, people posit thin particulars to solve the problem of individuation.

 
Posted by seigneur
10/03/2016 1:53 am
#6

Other: Single continuum. (Spiritual monism)

 
Posted by Dennis
10/04/2016 10:21 am
#7

Well, I take universals to be the substances of the world and that individuation is a matter of haeccitas (Other). I suppose I'm taking this to be a primitive, and I'm going to change my mind sooner rather than later. If this commits me to something like Bundle-theory for now, so be it, but that's my position (for now).

Last edited by Dennis (10/04/2016 10:23 am)

 
Posted by John West
10/04/2016 10:52 am
#8

Dennis wrote:

Well, I take universals to be the substances of the world and that individuation is a matter of haeccitas (Other). I suppose I'm taking this to be a primitive, and I'm going to change my mind sooner rather than later. If this commits me to something like Bundle-theory for now, so be it, but that's my position (for now).

I shall check you in the bare particulars row. 

 
Posted by 884heid
10/04/2016 11:04 am
#9

John West wrote:

I shall check you in the bare particulars row. 

I thought I was going to be the only one who chooses bare particulars so this is a pleasant surprise.

 
Posted by iwpoe
10/04/2016 11:56 pm
#10

seigneur wrote:

Other: Single continuum. (Spiritual monism)

Well, even Hegelians and Spinozists hold that the whole, or whatever is a substance in some sense. Since I'm tempted to monism I didn't want to bake-in a determination about plurality into my thought about substance.


Fighting to the death "the noonday demon" of Acedia.
My Books
It is precisely “values” that are the powerless and threadbare mask of the objectification of beings, an objectification that has become flat and devoid of background. No one dies for mere values.
~Martin Heidegger
 


Page:  Next »

 
Main page
Login
Desktop format