Classical Theism, Philosophy, and Religion Forum

You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?

7/04/2018 8:59 pm  #1

Aristotelian realism vs Platonic realism

A common critique of the Platonic idea of a bifurcated reality where particulars exist in the physical realm and uninstantiated universals or forms exist in a non-physical realm, is that it's hard to understand or even fathom how a concrete spatially limited being could bear any relation to the radically transcendent, non-particular, non-physical form. But doesn't the Aristotelian have the same issue? On the Aristotelian view all forms are instantiated and are only universal when abstracted via an intellect--but how does a concrete particular bear such a relation to universal abstraction?


Board footera


Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum