@Alexander,
Okay, now that you've made it clear to me why the statement I've said was pretty stupid(I can't believe I tried to deny logic) I can now pinpoint my main hesitation is that for me I'm having trouble conceiving how the immaterial exist, and how much we can know about it.

@Alexander
The reason I said what I did about logic and reality was because of something someone said to me about Godels Ontological proof:
"Actually, what Kurt Gödel was doing is commonly misunderstood. He was explicitly trying to make a point about the derivability of logic, to be precise a point about predicate logic, NOT to achieve anything that could be called evidence, let alone proof, for the existance of god" and "he is only engaged in a logical investigation (that is, in showing that such a proof with classical assumptions (completeness, etc.) correspondingly axiomatized, is possible)"

@iwpoe
That looks interesting. Do you know any resources where I could start?

 

@iwpoe
Would you also recommend looking at the work of Frege for a treatment of how logic/reason can prove the immaterial.

@iwpoe
With regards to Russel what does this phrase about his Platonism mean exactly as the whole need not exist to be real confuses me:
"Russell’s Platonism involves a belief that there are mind-independent entities that need not exist to be real, that is, to subsist and have being. Entities, or what has being (and may or may not exist) are called terms, and terms include anything that can be thought."

Hi Mysterious Brony,

The following, I suppose is a diction from the holy spirit, rather than I.

Faith comes in at least three kinds.

Doctrinal Faith
This kind of faith concerns the acceptance of certain teachings of the church by faith alone, these are necessities to being a catholic.

Natural Faith
This is the discipline St. Thomas's faith,

John 20: 24 - 29
But Thomas (who was called the Twin[a]), one of the twelve, was not with them when Jesus came. 25 So the other disciples told him, “We have seen the Lord.” But he said to them, “Unless I see the mark of the nails in his hands, and put my finger in the mark of the nails and my hand in his side, I will not believe.” 26 A week later his disciples were again in the house, and Thomas was with them. Although the doors were shut, Jesus came and stood among them and said, “Peace be with you.” 27 Then he said to Thomas, “Put your finger here and see my hands. Reach out your hand and put it in my side. Do not doubt but believe.” 28 Thomas answered him, “My Lord and my God!” 29 Jesus said to him, “Have you believed because you have seen me? Blessed are those who have not seen and yet have come to believe.”

St. Thomas's faith is dependent upon what is demonstrable, to the effect that when demonstrated, he naturally believes. We can term this, 'simple faith.' I have such simple faith to the arguments that come from Classical Theism exemplifying the power of reason. But, this is only a primer to a real Christian's life which lies in Expectant faith.

Expectant Faith
This is the more serious kind of faith, which involves lots of things. Whenever we ask, we have to expect to get it. Faith is an affair where which there is a complete elimination of doubt. 

What I'm trying to say is that, if you place simple faith on Classical Theism and how they argue, the expectant faith will surely follow. That was and is the case with me, so I have no doubts concerning this. I believe. Every moment, every breath, and even this diction is an act which is possible and being made actual by God's concurrence. If so, I really find it hard to not expect answers when I pray .