Classical Theism, Philosophy, and Religion Forum
Fighting to the death "the noonday demon" of Acedia.
My Books
It is precisely “values” that are the powerless and threadbare mask of the objectification of beings, an objectification that has become flat and devoid of background. No one dies for mere values.
~Martin Heidegger
The classical theism forum has moved. Register at www.classicaltheism.createaforum.com.
- iwpoe
- Member
Offline 
- From: Knoxville, TN
- Registered: 6/26/2015
- Posts: 1,080
Re: Substantial Form
AKG wrote:
@iwpoe, I don't mean that he rejects quarks, but that he rejects atomism or modern interpretations lf it as he said in this post:
My question is why even though science shows there is a good chance fundamental particles exist.
The existence of quarks wouldn't ammount to a demonstration of metaphysical atomism, since, in short, it wouldn't show that quarks have no substantial form (nor would it show that the things composed of, at the lowest level available to us, quarks have no substantial form over and above that of the quarks, but this is an aditional seperate dispute).
I can try to give a better presentation of that when I get back from the mechanic, if you'd like.
Fighting to the death "the noonday demon" of Acedia.
My Books
It is precisely “values” that are the powerless and threadbare mask of the objectification of beings, an objectification that has become flat and devoid of background. No one dies for mere values.
~Martin Heidegger
- AKG
- Banned
Offline
- Registered: 7/08/2015
- Posts: 375
Re: Substantial Form
That would be cool, thanks!
- •
Thread Starter