Classical Theism, Philosophy, and Religion Forum

You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



7/02/2015 6:51 pm  #1


Is it lawful to amputate a member?

Is it lawful to amputate a member when the overall good of the body demands it? How does that relates to the idea that is not lawful to bring about good by doing an evil action? Of course, I'm asking for a traditional natural law perspective.

 

7/02/2015 7:00 pm  #2


Re: Is it lawful to amputate a member?

I would ask you first precisely what do you define as evil?


Noli turbare circulos meos.
 

7/02/2015 7:34 pm  #3


Re: Is it lawful to amputate a member?

Evil would be understood as a par with good. Good is the realization / actualization of a natural end, evil the opposite, that is, the privation of a natural end. Amputation, per se, it's obviously evil since it frustrates the ends of that body part.

Just to confirm, I'm not trolling or anything. This is a real doubt.

     Thread Starter
 

7/02/2015 7:35 pm  #4


Re: Is it lawful to amputate a member?

Well then, how is the amputation against the good? A limb per itself has no just or unjust treatment.


Noli turbare circulos meos.
 

7/02/2015 7:36 pm  #5


Re: Is it lawful to amputate a member?

Presumably, he means the natural law sense of an immoral and unnatural act, one against the good.

I don't think the OP's question can be answered unless we know the circumstances. Is the amputation because the limb is injured and diseased and may cause death?  

 

7/02/2015 7:36 pm  #6


Re: Is it lawful to amputate a member?

Hi, Etzelnik. See my post above at 7:34 pm.

     Thread Starter
 

7/02/2015 7:38 pm  #7


Re: Is it lawful to amputate a member?

Jeremy Taylor wrote:

Presumably, he means the natural law sense of an immoral and unnatural act, one against the good.

I don't think the OP's question can be answered unless we know the circumstances. Is the amputation because the limb is injured and diseased and may cause death?  

I was thinking more about death (either you amputate it or you die); if anyone wants to talk about an injured limb, I would like to hear about it too.

     Thread Starter
 

7/02/2015 7:39 pm  #8


Re: Is it lawful to amputate a member?

Yeah. I get it.

However, I don't think that a limb, when abstracted from the overall body, has any sort of independent purpose which could be frustrated, provided the amputations necessity to the rest of the organism.

Last edited by Etzelnik (7/02/2015 7:44 pm)


Noli turbare circulos meos.
 

7/02/2015 7:44 pm  #9


Re: Is it lawful to amputate a member?

My understanding is that the natural law tradition sees it as permissible to amputate a limb, or remove an organ, if that is needed to save oné's life, because the ends of the limb are subsumed in the ends of the whole body. But I don't know where the line is drawn about diseased limbs (or organs). I don't think it would be considered permissible if one was someone who had a psychological condition and wished to have the limb amputated for this reason.

 

7/02/2015 7:46 pm  #10


Re: Is it lawful to amputate a member?

Jeremy Taylor wrote:

My understanding is that the natural law tradition sees it as permissible to amputate a limb, or remove an organ, if that is needed to save oné's life, because the ends of the limb are subsumed in the ends of the whole body. But I don't know where the line is drawn about diseased limbs (or organs). I don't think it would be considered permissible if one was someone who had a psychological condition and wished to have the limb amputated for this reason.

 
In the case of psychological condition, couldn't we say that the soul's well being supercedes even that of the body?


Noli turbare circulos meos.
 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum