No, today is April Fool's Day. Since Dawkins is the biggest fool there is I'm proposing that we rename it Richard Dawkins Day, a day to demonstrate how much of a fool he is. It's not an actual thing(yet).

Oh, oh the movie "The Unbelievers," featuring Dawkins along with his buddy Krauss. An extra bonus: After watching the end credits interviews, I didn't knew whether to laugh or cry. Absolutely no Mackie, no Rowe, no Schellenberg, no Smith, no Gale, no Oppy, no Draper, no Tooley, etc. 

Jeremy Taylor wrote:

Besides, there are, apparently, acrimonious internal conflicts within the movement, mostly about the place of identity politics and political correctness within the movement. ​

Tell me more...
 

I'm not so sure. My brother is a Dawkins fan and he certainly thinks much of these divisions.

​Besides, some of the lustre of the movement came from friendly support in important sections of the left-liberal media. But much of this media is far more ambivalent to Dawkins et al these days. The Guardian isn't that much more friendly to him than they would be to Dr. Feser. It isn't just that some of the prominent New Atheists are a little sceptical of the excesses of radical feminism. It is also they are more consistent in their secularism and left-liberalism when it comes to non-white, non-Christian people, especially Muslims.

I'm a traditionalist and don't agree with many of the criticisms of Islam, but I have to admit the likes of Dawkins are at least more consistent than many left-liberals, who seem to bend over backwards to excuse behaviour in non-whites, females, and non-Christians they wouldn't in whites or males or Christians.