Offline
Trying to find a good defense of hylemorphism--specifically one that really delves into the nature of prime matter.
Offline
Defense against what? Anyway, here's an exposition of hylemorphism
It comes highly recommended by Edward Feser
Concerning prime matter, there's Oderberg's Real Essentialism, also highly recommended by Feser.
Last edited by seigneur (8/03/2017 4:21 am)
Offline
seigneur wrote:
Defense against what? Anyway, here's an exposition of hylemorphism
It comes highly recommended by Edward Feser
Concerning prime matter, there's Oderberg's Real Essentialism, also highly recommended by Feser.
Thanks.
Offline
I disagree with the author but one of the man works on this topic is Jeff Brower'sAquinas's Ontology of the Material World: Change, Hylomorphism, and Material Objects.
A word of warning: avoid anything by Jaworski like the plague.
Offline
DanielCC wrote:
I disagree with the author but one of the man works on this topic is Jeff Brower'sAquinas's Ontology of the Material World: Change, Hylomorphism, and Material Objects.
A word of warning: avoid anything by Jaworski like the plague.
Thanks,I've listened to one of Brower's lectures before and it was good. The book seems promising.
Offline
@ DanielCC
I'm curious. Why should we avoid Jaworski?
Offline
Mysterious Brony wrote:
@ DanielCC
I'm curious. Why should we avoid Jaworski?
Because the book is just non-reductive physicalism which, for reasons best known to himself, that author decides to call hylemorphism. It isn't even that he happens to reject hylemorphic dualism - it's that his variant of hylemorphism has virtually nothing to do with what is termed form in Aristotelian ontology (he implies form is spatial and structural arrangement) Also: the book contains the usual dismissive cliches about the g..g..g..gh..ghost in the machine!